Legal Opinion
Segar v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided December 3, 1981No. Claim No. 64173PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Jerome F. Hanifin, J.
In 1959, the State appropriated a permanent easement in a streambed located on claimants’ property for which an award was made. (Burdick v State of New York, Ct of Claims, Aug. 26, 1963, Heller, J.) The easement was taken for the purpose of “constructing, reconstructing and maintaining *** a stream channel and dike” in order to provide drainage for an adjacent highway. Rights reserved to the owner included the “right and privilege of using this property *** providing the exercise of such right and privilege does not, in the opinion of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hallock v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Baker v. . HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Kravec v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Mendelson v. BoettgerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Mendelson v. BoettgerNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hamlet at Willow Creek Development Co. v. Northeast Land Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Bingham v. ZoltDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993