Legal Opinion
Hallock v. State of New York
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 3, 1973PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
Sand and gravel are required as filler for the construction by the State Power Authority of a dam for a power project. This case raises the question whether in this instance the taking by eminent domain of a full fee interest in the property from which the sand and gravel are to be extracted can be justified where it is said that an easement would serve the public purpose as fully. In our judgment this issue cannot be decided on the meager record before us and the case must go to trial,
Appellants (State and Power Authority) appeal, pursuant.to leave granted by the Appellate Division, from an…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kaskel v. ImpellitteriNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Rockland Light and Power Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Sweet v. Buffalo, New York & Philadelphia Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Sixth Avenue Railroad Co. v. . KerrNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Matter of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Hallock v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Matter of City of Ny (Grand Lafayette)New York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Kaufmann's Carousel, Inc. v. City of Syracuse Industrial Development AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Rafferty v. Town of ColonieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Gyrodyne Co. of America, Inc. v. State University of New York at Stony BrookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.