Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Hedin v. Westdala Lutheran Church

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1938No. 6508Published

1Concurrence

AILSHIE, J.,

Concurring. — I concur in the foregoing opinion and I feel constrained to make this further comment on the error contained in the instruction quoted by Justice Morgan. It is going entirely too far to tell a jury that a testator may be competent to dispose of his estate by will when at the same time he was mentally incapable of entering into a contract or disposing of any part of his property by sale or otherwise. That has apparently been sanctioned by some courts as the law but it is not sound reason and ought not to be the law anywhere. Such an instruction in effect tells the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re the Appraisal, Under the Transfer Tax Act, of the Estate of DelanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Breadheft v. ClevelandIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
  3. In Re Ward's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Lewark v. DoddIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Ervin v. ShawSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API