Legal Opinion

Watson v. Watson

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1894PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Judd, O. J.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court, by

Bickerton, J.

This matter comes here ou appeal from the decision aud *390decree of the Chief Justice, which gives a full statement of the ease, and is as follows :

• “On the 21st February, 1887, there was filed a bill for partition of certain lands in Kaneohe, Koolaupoko, Oahu, the subject of a devise by John D. Watson, the father of the plaintiffs and defendant. The plaintiffs were William, Thomas, John, Henry, Roland, George, Caroline and Emelia, and the defendant was David, the eldest son of said John D. Watson.

“A demurrer wa.s interposed and sustained, and the bill…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Waddell v. WaddellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  2. Schmick v. NoelTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Hart v. SteedmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  4. Edwards v. DykemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Frederick v. PacquetteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re KewaloHawaii Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Ward v. City & County of HonoluluCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
  3. Budnik v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913
  4. Spreckels v. MacfarlaneHawaii Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API