Watson v. Watson
Hawaii Supreme Court
Appeal from Judd, O. J.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court, by
Bickerton, J.
This matter comes here ou appeal from the decision aud *390decree of the Chief Justice, which gives a full statement of the ease, and is as follows :
• “On the 21st February, 1887, there was filed a bill for partition of certain lands in Kaneohe, Koolaupoko, Oahu, the subject of a devise by John D. Watson, the father of the plaintiffs and defendant. The plaintiffs were William, Thomas, John, Henry, Roland, George, Caroline and Emelia, and the defendant was David, the eldest son of said John D. Watson.
“A demurrer wa.s interposed and sustained, and the bill…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Waddell v. WaddellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
- Schmick v. NoelTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Hart v. SteedmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
- Edwards v. DykemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Frederick v. PacquetteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1865
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re KewaloHawaii Supreme Court · 1931
- Ward v. City & County of HonoluluCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- Budnik v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913
- Spreckels v. MacfarlaneHawaii Supreme Court · 1894