Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Dykeman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1884No. 11,324PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Cass Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

On the 23d day of August, 1873, Martha Plant and others, claiming to be heirs at law of one Martha Bliss, who died in 1871, commenced an action in the Cass Circuit Court against the other heirs at law of such decedent, and against certain other named persons as the heirs at law of one Allen Hamilton, deceased, and against certain other named persons as the heirs at law of one Cyrus Taber, deceased. In the plaintiffs’ complaint in such action, it was alleged that, on March 1st, 1854, Cyrus Taber and Allen Hamilton executed to the said Martha Bliss their certain title-bond, whereiii it was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Little v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Morris v. SternIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Railsback v. GreveIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Milligan v. PooleIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Clark v. StephensonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Batty v. Arizona State Dental BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Barton v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Kitts v. WillsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Illinois Life Insurance v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1927
  5. Hodgin v. HodginIndiana Supreme Court · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API