Legal Opinion
Joseph B. Crawford v. The United States. Rocco A. Trecosta v. The United States. Gail M. Aanenson v. The United States. Harry W. Aho v. The United States. Helen Phyllis Abrahamsen v. The United States. Esther Katrina Barnes v. The United States. Edna T. Ackal v. The United States.
United States Court of Claims
Decided March 17, 1967No. 267-65Published
1Opinion of the Court
376 F.2d 266
Joseph B. CRAWFORD et al.
v.
The UNITED STATES.
Rocco A. TRECOSTA
v.
The UNITED STATES.
Gail M. AANENSON et al.
v.
The UNITED STATES.
Harry W. AHO et al.
v.
The UNITED STATES.
Helen Phyllis ABRAHAMSEN et al.
v.
The UNITED STATES.
Esther Katrina BARNES et al.
v.
The UNITED STATES.
Edna T. ACKAL et al.
v.
The UNITED STATES.*
No. 83-65.
No. 93-65.
No. 267-65.
No. 449-65.
No. 159-66.
No. 212-66.
No. 407-66.
United States Court of Claims.
March 17, 1967.
Rocco A. Trecosta, pro se, in No. 93-65.
Earl C. Berger, attorney of record, for plaintiffs in cases Nos. 83-65, 267-65, 449-65, 159-66, 212-66, and 407-66, Lorber,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. MenascheSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.