Legal Opinion
Barber v. Cincinnati Bengals, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 5, 1994No. 93-35854PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge ALARCON; Dissent by Judge KLEINFELD.
ALARCON, Circuit Judge
Dale Barber appeals from the dismissal of the action he filed on behalf of Victoria Cryt-zer’s minor children for loss of parental consortium. The aetion was brought against the Cincinnati Bengals, Inc., and certain members of that football team (the Bengals). Crytzer filed an action against the Bengals on April 10, 1992 for damages for personal injuries and for recision of a release of her claims. The claim for loss of parental consortium arises from the injuries allegedly suffered by Crytzer.
On April 9,1993, a jury…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ruth E. Oscar Charles Spinosa v. University Students Co-Operative Association George ProperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Scott v. Pacific West Mountain ResortWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Ueland v. Pengo Hydra-Pull Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
- James West v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Conradt v. Four Star Promotions, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tammy Burke, Royal Insurance Company, Linda Burke Daniels, Plaintiff-Third-Party v. John Smith, Heyl Truck Lines, Inc., Defendants-Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Hall-Mark Electronics Corp. v. Sims (In Re Lee)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Dale Barber v. Cincinnati Bengals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Nancy Blute, parent and legal guardian of the minor C.B. and on behalf of C.B. v. Sascha Sudikoff and Jeffrey SudikoffDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2026
- Tammy Burke v. John SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001