Legal Opinion
Dale Barber v. Cincinnati Bengals, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 5, 1994No. 93-35854Published
1Opinion of the Court
41 F.3d 553
Dale BARBER, Guardian Ad Litem for Candace Crytzer, Blaize
Barber, Chandra Barber, and Alissa Alexander,
Minors, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CINCINNATI BENGALS, INC., a Foreign Corporation; Lewis
Billups; James Brooks; Carl Carter, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 93-35854.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Aug. 4, 1994.
Decided Dec. 5, 1994.
Victoria L. Vreeland (argued), Gordon, Thomas, Honeywell, Malanca, Peterson & Daheim, Seattle, WA, Richard C. Eymann (on the briefs), Feltman, Gebhardt, Eymann & Jones, Spokane, WA, for plaintiffs-appellants.
Robert G.…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ruth E. Oscar Charles Spinosa v. University Students Co-Operative Association George ProperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Scott v. Pacific West Mountain ResortWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Reichelt v. Johns-Manville Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
- Ueland v. Pengo Hydra-Pull Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
- James West v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.