Legal Opinion

State v. Driver

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 20, 1964No. 653PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The court - appointed counsel advanced this argument: “The present defendant is an alcoholic and this fact is acknowledged by all who have come into contact with him, from the arresting officer to the Court which sentenced him. This alcoholism, while not the reason for his imprisonment, is certainly the cause of it. His addiction has put him in jail. Yet he has not been assigned to a medical rehabilitation center but sent to the roads. As an impoverished inmate he cannot obtain outside medical aid. So for two years the State of North Carolina impounds the defendant, an acknowledgedly ill man,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Joe B. Driver v. Arthur Hinnant, Superintendent Halifax County Prison Unit of the North Carolina State Prison DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
  2. State v. PardonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Patton v. State of North CarolinaDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1966
  4. Driver v. HinnantDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1965
  5. State v. TiradoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API