State v. Read
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSchindler, J.
¶1 A person commits the crime of malicious harassment by intentionally threatening a specific individual and placing that individual in reasonable fear of harm because of the victim’s race, color, ancestry, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, or mental, physical, or sensory handicap. Charles Read appeals his conviction of malicious harassment, arguing the evidence does not establish beyond a reasonable doubt that he maliciously and intentionally threatened the victim because of her race, and the trial court erred in failing to determine whether race was the primary motivating factor.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Brandenburg v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Claiborne Hardware Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. EnglundCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State v. FloydCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Melter v. MelterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Melter v. MelterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- State Of Washington v. Allen EnglundCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015