Legal Opinion

State v. Floyd

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 17, 2013No. Nos. 42396-1-II; 43021-5-IIPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBjorgen, J.

¶1 Thomas Floyd appeals from his convictions for second degree assault and six violations of a no-contact order, as well as the sentencing court’s use of his 1972 convictions for robbery and second degree assault in calculating his offender score. The State cross appeals the sentencing court’s determination that Floyd does not qualify as a persistent offender subject to a mandatory life sentence under the Persistent Offender Accountability Act (POAA), RCW 9.94A.570. The State also appeals from a different sentencing court’s offender score calculation, resulting from Floyd’s subsequent…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. State v. RohrichWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. RohrichWashington Supreme Court · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. EnglundCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  2. State Of Washington v. Allen EnglundCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. State of Washington v. Kevin Lee GalloCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API