Estate of Walling v. Commissioner
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
STALEY, Chief Judge.
This petition for review of a decision of the Tax. Court requires us to decide whether certain amounts expended by taxpayers were deductible as “repairs” under § 162(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S.C. § 162(a).1 The *192Tax Court held that the repairs were incidental to the transfer of the capital assets on which they were made and were, therefore, capital in nature, resulting in a determination of a deficiency in taxpayers’ return for the year of 1957.
In 1957, taxpayers, ,Ritner K. Walling 2 and Margaret C. Walling, his wife, were engaged…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McDonald v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Tank Truck Rentals, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- National Securities Corp. v. Com'r of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
- Central Cuba Sugar Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Central Cuba Sugar CoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Portland Oil Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Foster v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1983
- Dominion Resources, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Jerome S. Moss, Sandra Moss, Sharon M. Alesia, Herb Alpert, and Lani Alpert v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Hempt Bros., Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Norwest Corp. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.