Legal Opinion

Norwest Corp. v. Comm'r

United States Tax Court

Decided April 28, 1997No. Docket Nos. 20567-93, 26213-93PublishedCited by 11 opinions

I. Norwest Bank Nebraska, N.A., a subsidiary of petitioner, removed asbestos-containing materials from its Douglas Street building in connection with the building's renovation and remodeling. On its 1989 return, petitioner claimed a $ 902,206 ordinary and necessary business deduction with respect to the asbestos-removal expenditures. In the notice of deficiency, respondent disallowed the deduction.

Read the full summary

I. Norwest Bank Nebraska, N.A., a subsidiary of petitioner, removed asbestos-containing materials from its Douglas Street building in connection with the building's renovation and remodeling. On its 1989 return, petitioner claimed a $ 902,206 ordinary and necessary business deduction with respect to the asbestos-removal expenditures. In the notice of deficiency, respondent disallowed the deduction. Held: The costs of removing the asbestos-containing materials must be capitalized because they were part of a general plan of rehabilitation and renovation that improved the Douglas Street…

1Opinion of the Court

CONTENTS

Page

269 General Findings .

270 Issue I. Removal of Asbestos-Containing Materials

270 A. The Douglas Street Building.

270 B. Remodeling Plans .

C. Use of Asbestos-Containing Materials in the Douglas Street Building . 271

D. Federal Asbestos Guidelines . tH <N

273 E. Testing at the Douglas Street Building and Decision To Remove Asbestos-Containing Materials.

F. Contractors and Work Performed . 274

G. Health Concerns. 276

H. Liability Issues. 276

I. Tax and Accounting Matters . 277

J. Petitioner’s Returns and Petitions . 278

K. Notice of Deficiency. 278

Discussion . 278

L. Capital Expenditures vs.…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Jack E. Golsen and Sylvia H. Golsen v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  4. Commissioner v. Court Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Indopco, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cinergy Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  2. Gibson & Associates, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2011
  3. Kerr-McGee Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  4. Badger Pipe Line Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1997
  5. TSAKOPOULOS v. COMMISSIONERUnited States Tax Court · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API