Legal Opinion

Spartan Pools v. Royal

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 25, 1980No. 79-241PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal involves an alleged misrepresentation by Spartan Pools to the Royals through its sales brochure, which contains this language:

"In order to help you, your Spartan dealer has everything you need for pool planning and design. He's fully qualified and has installed (and helped design) scores of beautiful pools."

Much of the evidence is undisputed. Spartan Pools manufactures, and distributes through authorized dealers, components for the installation of vinyl-lined swimming pools. In February, 1977, Spartan Pools entered into a dealership contract with Pacesetter of Mobile,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hall Motor Company v. FurmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  2. Maring-Crawford Motor Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  3. Randell v. BanzhoffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Continental Volkswagen, Inc. v. SoutulloCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  5. Rush v. ATOMIC ELEC. CO.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Shiloh Const. Co., Inc. v. Mercury Const. Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Ex Parte LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  3. Long-Lewis Hardware Co. v. LightseyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  4. Fan Fare, Inc. v. Fourdel Industries, Ltd.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1983
  5. National SEC. Ins. Co. v. BeasleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API