Kerr v. Hickenlooper
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
This case has a long history. The issue currently before us is whether certain school districts, a special district board, and/or a county commission have standing to challenge Colorado's Taxpayer Bill of Rights ("TABOR"). Colo. Const. art. X, § 20. TABOR allows the people of Colorado to raise or prevent tax increases by popular vote, thereby limiting the power of Colorado's legislative bodies to levy taxes. On a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), the district court held that plaintiffs had Article III…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Horne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Susan B. Anthony List v. DriehausSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Richison v. Ernest Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kerr v. PolisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
- Hill v. WarsewaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Frida Kahlo Corporation v. Artists Rights Society, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2023
- Goodwin v. GoodwinDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020
- Hernandez v. United Builder Services, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.