Legal Opinion

Kerr v. Hickenlooper

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 22, 2019No. 17-1192PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.

This case has a long history. The issue currently before us is whether certain school districts, a special district board, and/or a county commission have standing to challenge Colorado's Taxpayer Bill of Rights ("TABOR"). Colo. Const. art. X, § 20. TABOR allows the people of Colorado to raise or prevent tax increases by popular vote, thereby limiting the power of Colorado's legislative bodies to levy taxes. On a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), the district court held that plaintiffs had Article III…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Horne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Susan B. Anthony List v. DriehausSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Richison v. Ernest Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kerr v. PolisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
  2. Hill v. WarsewaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  3. Frida Kahlo Corporation v. Artists Rights Society, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2023
  4. Goodwin v. GoodwinDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020
  5. Hernandez v. United Builder Services, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API