Navarino v. Dudrap
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On error.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Van Syckel, J.
This is an action for malicious prosecution, in which the plaintiff (Navarino) was nonsuited.
Dudrap, the defendant, made an affidavit September 20th, 1899, before a justice of the peace, charging “that on the thirteenth day of May, 1899, at the town of AVest Hoboken, Navarino [the plaintiff] did designedly and. feloniously and by false pretence that he went to the store of deponent and represented that he was sent to get a lot of goods amounting to twenty-two dollars and fifteen cents by said Julet Dudrap, with intent to cheat and defraud…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dennis v. . RyanNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Hahn v. SchmidtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Collins v. LoveIndiana Supreme Court · 1845
- Forrest v. CollierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
- Streight v. BellIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Cashen v. SpannNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- McFadden v. LaneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1905
- Weisner v. HansenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
- Peal v. Mayor of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.