Legal Opinion

Ashton v. Pierce

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 22, 1982No. Civ. A. 81-719PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

GESELL, District Judge.

This is a class action against officials of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) challenging certain aspects of HUD’s implementation of the Lead Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (“LPPPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 4801 et seq. (1976). The class consists of all tenants or residents of HUD-associated public housing in the District of Columbia who are, or who have, young children who have experienced or who may in the future experience lead poisoning as a result of the presence of lead-based paint in their dwelling units. Plaintiffs assert that HUD…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. German v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  2. Robin Shade v. Housing Authority Of The City Of New HavenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  3. State of Ohio v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
  4. Carlough v. Amchem Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Hurt v. Philadelphia Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API