Legal Opinion

Demontigney v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 22, 1992No. 45A04-9110-CR-351PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, Judge.

This appeal presents a challenge to the constitutionality of the cruel confinement subsection of our neglect of a dependent statute, IND. CODE 35-46-1-4. The defendant-appellants John Wolfe and Lottie Demontigney, husband and wife, (collectively, the Wolfes) were convicted by a Lake County jury of a Class D felony for cruelly confining 2 their six-year old son, J.J.

In addition to challenging the constitutionality of the statute, Lottie argues the trial court improperly instructed the jury on the mens rea the State had to prove to win a conviction, and John argues the evidence is…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. State v. DowneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Hurt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Hartbarger v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matheney v. AndersonDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1999
  2. Dick v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  3. Dick v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  4. Dulce Zaragoza v. Merrick B. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API