Legal Opinion

Schuman v. Ignatin

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 23, 2010No. B215059PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WILLHITE, Acting P. J.

This case involves a dispute among property owners in a general plan development of 68 homes in Los Angeles. The *257owners of one of the properties, Allan Ignatin and Janet Sobell (collectively, Ignatin),1 want to build a house that other property owners believe would violate recorded restrictions (conditions, covenants and restrictions (CC&R’s)) governing the development. The owners of a neighboring property, Philip Schuman and Margaret McNulty (collectively, Schuman), filed a lawsuit against Ignatin, seeking to block the proposed construction. Ignatin…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jordache Enterprises Inc. v. BrobeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Minton v. CavaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Jordache Enterprises, Inc. v. BrobeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Styne v. StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Strong v. StrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ferguson v. YaspanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API