Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Cline

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 26, 1973No. 73-70PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lyle Brown, Justice.

Appellants, ten in number, are the sole heirs of Wm. Middleton, who died intestate. Appellants sought to cancel a rental and option to purchase agreement executed between Wm. Middleton and appellee, Isiah Cline. The trial court denied appellants relief and ordered them to carry out the option to purchase agreement as requested by appellee in his cross-complaint. It was appellants’ contention that appellee was in arrears on his rental payments which they say resulted in a forfeiture of the agreement. On that critical point the trial court held the testimony to be completely…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Duncan v. MalcombSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  2. Pierce v. KennedySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  3. Cannon v. PriceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Entrepreneur, Ltd. v. YasunaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Vereen v. HargroveCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Schrum ex rel. Gaither v. BoldingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  4. Shakey's Inc. v. CapleDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1994
  5. Carter v. WaymackCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API