Legal Opinion
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Bowers
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 24, 1959No. 9PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Whittaker
The principal question presented by these cases is whether appellant in No. 9, the Youngstown Sheet and Tube Company, and petitioner in No. 44, United States Plywood Corporation, have so acted upon the materials which they have imported for use in their manufacturing operations as to cause them to lose their distinctive character as “imports,” within the meaning of that term as used in the Import-Export Clause, Art. I, § 10, cl. 2, of the United States Constitution.1 The Supreme Courts of the States concerned have held that these manufacturers have done so. Our task is to decide whether, on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Thurlow v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
- Richfield Oil Corp. v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hooven & Allison Co. v. EvattSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Low v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Michelin Tire Corp. v. WagesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Polar Tankers, Inc. v. City of Valdez, AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- City of Houston and Houston Independent School District v. Standard-Triumph Motor Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- Portland Pipe Line Corp. v. Environmental Improvement CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
- Hearst Corp. v. State Department of Assessments & TaxationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.