Legal Opinion

Vaerst v. Tanzman

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 21, 1990No. A047329Published

1Opinion of the Court

222 Cal.App.3d 1535 (1990)

272 Cal. Rptr. 503

SARAH T. VAERST, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

ARNOLD TANZMAN, Defendant and Respondent.

Docket No. A047329.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.

August 21, 1990.

COUNSEL

Bronson, Bronson & McKinnon, Robert C. Gebhardt and Jary J. Hulst for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Gassett, Perry & Frank and Charles R. Roe for Defendant and Respondent.

[Opinion certified for partial publication.[*]]

OPINION

ANDERSON, P.J.

Plaintiff Sarah T. Vaerst (appellant) appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict denying recovery in a personal injury action.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API