Legal Opinion

Claster Bros. v. Katz

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 19, 1898No. Appeal, No. 135PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal, No. 135, Oct. T., 1897, by. plaintiffs, from judgment of C. P. Lancaster Co., Nov. T., 1896, Nos. 35 and 36, on verdict for defendant. Sheriff’s interpleader. Before Brubaker, J. The value of the goods in controversy appears to have been somewhere between $82.00 and $152.27. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court. Yerdiet for defendant. Plaintiffs appealed.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 135, Oct. T., 1897, by. plaintiffs, from judgment of C. P. Lancaster Co., Nov. T., 1896, Nos. 35 and 36, on verdict for defendant. Sheriff’s interpleader. Before Brubaker, J. The value of the goods in controversy appears to have been somewhere between $82.00 and $152.27. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court. Yerdiet for defendant. Plaintiffs appealed. Errors assigned were, (1) In charging the jury as follows: “ The law in this state has been well settled since the opinion of Judge Mitchell, which has been quoted here, who had given an opinion in a case in the…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rice, P. J.,

This was a sheriff’s interpleader to try the title to certain goods levied upon as the property of J. Blankfield. The plaintiffs were in the wholesale clothing and notion business in the city of Harrisburg, and Blankfield was in the same business as a retailer in Ephrata in the county of Lancaster.

On or about September 13, 1896, Blankfield ordered goods of the plaintiffs to the amount of about $300. Later in the same day he ordered goods of E. Katz, also doing business in Harrisburg, to the amount of $292.73, and on September 15th, (pursuant to an agreement made on the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. Smith, Murphy, & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
  2. Bughman v. Central BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  3. Mackinley v. M'GregorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838
  4. Levan's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  5. Ralph v. FonDersmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Halsey v. Diamond Distilleries Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1911
  2. North American Smelting Co. v. TempleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  3. Ralph v. FonDersmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  4. Collings Tailor Co. v. AppenzellarSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API