Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Maryland Motor Vehicle Administration

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 28, 2016No. 10/16PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarrell, J.

What does Petitioner, John T. Mitchell, have in common with “Seinfeld’s” Cosmo Kramer? Both received and displayed on their respective motor vehicles, for a period of time, vanity license plates bearing words that had arguably scatological meanings. 1 Mitchell did not give up without a fight when the Maryland Motor Vehicle Administration (MVA) recalled his vanity plates; hence, this litigation.

The MVA granted in 2009 John T. Mitchell’s application for vanity license plates bearing the word “MIERDA.” Two years later, the MVA received a complaint 2 about “MIERDA” on the plates displayed on…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors of University of VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Porter v. GoreDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2018
  2. Carroll v. CraddockDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2020
  3. Curtis Whateley v. Gerald LackeyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2026
  4. Hart v. ThomasDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2019
  5. In the Matter of BlomquistCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2026

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API