Legal Opinion

Moul v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 19, 1932No. 12,644PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

These parties appeared in reverse order in the trial court and are hereinafter referred to as there, or by name. The Western Columbia Laundry Company is referred to as the Western Company, the Zott Laundry Company as the Zott Company and the Independent Investment Corporation as the Investment Company.

Plaintiffs charged that defendant took and converted $1,500 worth of their personal property, and they demanded judgment accordingly. Defendant denied generally and set up a counterclaim as to which assignments and briefs are silent, and which will not therefore be further noticed. Plaintiffs,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Griffith v. WrightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882
  2. Southern Surety Co. v. PetersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  3. Booth v. Central Savings BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
  4. Ehrenkrook v. EhrenkrookSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stapp v. Carb-Ice Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API