Shackelford v. Pool

A peremptory writ of mandamus is sought in this original action, to compel Gus Pool, clerk of this court, to refund a balance of a deposit for cost in cause No. 17928, which is an action long since closed, the mandate in that case having issued in the year 19-29.

The petitioner also seeks refunds, or an adjudication as a basis for refunds, for all former litigants similaifiy situated. The total amount involved runs into thousands of dollars.

The writ is denied. The reason for the denial follows

The clerk holds no money subject to the ■payment of the claim presented, for the claim was not made…