Legal Opinion
Mary Martinez v. Southern Ute Tribe, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 7, 1960No. 6232_1PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PICKETT Circuit Judge
„ „ , „ Mary Martinez brought this action for a declaration of her status as a member of the Southern Ute Tribe of Indians and a finding that she should receive per capita payments to which the members of the tribe are entitled. Lack of diversity of citizenship is conceded and it was alleged that the controversy “arises under the laws of the United States, including 25 U.S.C. § 163 and § 676,” and federal jurisdiction is asserted pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C.A. § 1331. 1 The trial court thought that the claim assert-ed and the relief sought in the complaint,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Taylor v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Shulthis v. McDougalSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Andersen v. Bingham & G. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
- Regents of New Mexico College of Agriculture & Mechanic Arts v. Albuquerque Broadcasting Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Betty B. Burgess, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of S. Reed Burgess, Jr., Deceased v. Charlottesville Savings and Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
- Hamilton v. NakaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Lee Motah and Horace Noyabad v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Hamilton v. NakaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Prairie Band of Pottawatomie Tribe of Indians v. PuckkeeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.