Legal Opinion

Cavaness v. Cox

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1979No. 15801PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Justice:

The Department of Public Safety deprived plaintiff of his license to operate a motor vehicle because of his refusal to submit to a chemical test to determine the alcoholic content of his blood as provided for in our implied consent statute.1 The matter was heard de novo2 in the district court and from a judgment thereof sustaining the action of the Department, plaintiff presents this appeal.

There is no material dispute in the facts and the trial record supports the following abstract thereof: Plaintiff was stopped by a police officer for a driving offense at which time he had…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Campbell v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  4. People v. SudduthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. People v. DuroncelayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. SwanUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Hoyle v. MonsonUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Holman v. CoxUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  5. State v. HoffmanUtah Supreme Court · 1987

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API