Legal Opinion

Werth v. Nolan

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 2, 1942No. 19PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Application by appellants for extension of time for filing brief. The time for filing said brief originally expired on November 6, 1942. Within that time (on November 6, 1942), they filed a motion, supported by affidavit and consented to by appellee, for an extension of time for its filing. The extension was granted until November 12, 1942. The brief was not filed, nor was any further extension sought within that period. Accordingly, the time expired on November 12, 1942. On

November 27, 1942, fifteen days after default, the present motion was filed. The reason given for the default is that…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tendler v. L. E. Massey, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Bowers v. BasilikoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API