Legal Opinion
Tendler v. L. E. Massey, Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 30, 1943No. 95PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDSON, Chief Judge.
Motions have been filed by appellee to strike from the record the reporter’s transcript of the trial, to dismiss or affirm, and to reconsider our order of June 2, 1943, *34granting without opinion an extension of the time for the approval of the transcript. The single question presented concerns the power of this court to grant the extension upon application made after lapse of the prescribed period.
Under our Rule 23, when the trial has been stenographically reported, appellant may file the reporter’s transcript in lieu of a statement of proceedings and evidence.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mosier v. Federal Reserve Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Burke v. CanfieldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- District Hauling & Construction Co. v. ArgerakisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- Walleck v. HudspethCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Morfessis v. Hollywood Credit Clothing Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960
- Graves v. MacDonaldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
- Bowers v. BasilikoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944