Whitcomb v. Miller
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco setting apart insurance money to ' the widow of a deceased person. Charles W. Slack, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
This is an appeal from an order setting apart property to the widow of deceased as exempt from execution.
The facts appear in the petition of the widow for the order, all ■ of which are admitted by the demurrer. Ho answer was filed or evidence taken at the hearing. Samuel Miller died in 1896, intestate, and Lillian Miller was appointed administratrix December 14, 1896, and duly qualified. An inventory and appraisement was filed March 15, 1897. It is averred that the administratrix has received five thousand dollars on account of a policy of insurance on the life of Samuel Miller, deceased,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Yore v. BoothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by9 opinions
- Holmes v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Estate of PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Lavendol v. LavendolNevada Supreme Court · 1922
- Lemp v. LempIdaho Supreme Court · 1919
- Mahoney v. City of PayetteIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.