Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Portland v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 12, 1992No. DA 396491-8906; CA A64089Published

1DissentWarren, J.

I dissent. The majority is correct that LaGrande/Astoria v. PERB, 281 Or 137, 576 P2d 1204, on rehearing, 284 Or 173, 586 P2d 765 (1978), Portland v. Dollarhide, 300 Or 490, 714 P2d 220 (1986), and Portland v. Lodi, 308 Or 468, 782 P2d 415 (1989), are hardly models of consistency and clarity. However, since Lodi, this court has twice analyzed state preemption law and has by now developed a coherent, workable standard that is consistent with precedent: State v. Long, 106 Or App 389, 807 P2d 815 (1991); Denton Plastics, Inc. v. City of Portland, 105 Or App 302, 804 P2d 1199 (1990)…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. HenryOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. LouisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1960

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API