Legal Opinion

United States v. Morris Zudick, and Pauline Zudick

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 2, 1975No. 75-1438PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.

United States v. Habig, 390 U.S. 222, 88 S.Ct. 926, 19 L.Ed.2d 1055 (1968), held that the statute of limitations for criminal violations of the Internal Revenue Code runs from the actual date of filing, and not from the due date, when a return is filed after the due date pursuant to an extension. The question presented in this appeal is whether the limitations period runs from the filing date or the due date when a return is filed before the due date. The district court ruled that the period began to run from the due date, rejected a motion to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Parker v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. United States v. HartwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1868

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. United States v. Peter J. Serubo, Donald H. Brown, United States of America v. W. Thomas Plachter, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  3. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  4. United States v. Harvey Birdman, United States of America v. William RichmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. Moskow, SigmundCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API