Legal Opinion

Faucher v. Rosenoff

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1911No. 9466PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Adams county, Holcomb, J., entered February 6, 1911, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the agreed statement of facts, in an action for a writ of mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

— This action was commenced by A. Faucher against A. F. Rosenoff, auditor of Adams county, to obtain a writ of mandamus compelling the issuance of a salary warrant to plaintiff as county treasurer, on the basis of a salary of $1,800 per annum. The writ was issued, and defendant has appealed.

On October 3, 1906, the board of commissioners made an order placing Adams county in the thirteenth class, which means that the population was then ascertained to be 14,000 and under 16,000. Rem. & Bal. Code, § 4031. Thereafter, from January, 1907, until January, 1911, salaries of officers of counties of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. City of CentraliaWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. State ex rel. Maltbie v. WillWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. State ex rel. Smith v. NealWashington Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Jaumotte v. ZimmermanMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  2. James v. McMillanWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  3. State ex rel. Elwood v. LoveringWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. State Ex Rel. Jordan v. DehartWashington Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API