Legal Opinion

Garzon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 18, 2006No. 4D04-4699, No. 4D04-4705PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

939 So.2d 278 (2006)

ZAMIR GARZON and RAY C. BALTHAZAR, Appellants,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D04-4699, No. 4D04-4705.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

October 18, 2006.

Samuel R.R. Halpern, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant Zamir Garzon.

John Cotrone, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant Ray Balthazar.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David M. Schultz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

GROSS, J.

The primary issue we address in this case is whether the trial court's use of the "and/or" conjunction between the names of codefendants…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Klein; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Klein.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Castor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  2. State v. DelvaSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  3. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
  4. Reed v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  5. Stewart v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1982

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Garzon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  2. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  3. Love v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  4. Abbott v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  5. Barnett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API