Legal Opinion

Barnett v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 11, 2013No. 4D11-4325PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConner, J.

The propriety of using the conjunctive-disjunctive phrase “and/or” in charging a defendant or instructing a jury has vexed trial and appellate courts since its use was first addressed by the Florida Supreme Court in Cochrane v. Florida East Coast Railway Co., 107 Fla. 431, 145 So. 217 (1932). On the facts of this case, we hold that the use of “and/or” in jury instructions regarding attempted felony murder against two possible victims was not fundamental error and did not create the possibility of a non-unanimous verdict.

Leon Barnett and his brother were charged in one information for a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bottoson v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  2. Garzon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  3. Garzon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  4. Cochrane v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932
  5. Perley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. John Thomas Dorsey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  2. Luis Rios v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  3. NEEMIAS RAMIREZ RAMOS v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  4. Zairon Jarquis Fussell v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  5. Barnett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API