Legal Opinion

Emerald Coal & Coke Co. v. Equitable Gas Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 1954No. Appeal, No. 80PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Arnold,

This is a bill in equity brought by the plaintiffs to obtain injunctive and other equitable relief against the defendant-appellant Gas Company, because of its storage of natural gas in strata directly underlying portions of plaintiffs’ active coal mining areas and *593mined-out or gob areas connected therewith. The gas is injected under pipe line pressure of 980 pounds per square inch and the storage in question is known as the Pratt Pool.

The complaint asserts, inter alia, that the plaintiffs operate two large electrically mechanized underground coal mines in Greene…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Public Util. Comm'n of Ohio v. United Fuel Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Puritan Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Ederal Power Commission v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Michigan Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Feingold v. Bell of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. White v. Conestoga Title InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Rogoff v. the Buncher Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Leveto v. National Fuel Gas Distribution Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. United Water New Mexico, Inc. v. New Mexico Public Utility CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API