Legal Opinion
Fessler v. Fariss
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 31, 1956No. 37104PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HALLEY, Justice.
The mineral interest involved in this action is part of the minerals in and under 168.89 acres in Oklahoma County described as Lots 1 and 2 and the South Half of N.E. Quarter of Section S-13N-3W. This land was patented to Martin Fessler, Sr. in 1911.
December 19, 1929, Martin Fessler, Sr. and wife conveyed to Frank Buttram a one-half interest in all of the minerals under .the entire tract for a period of twenty-five years, or as long as mining operations or .production continued. It was agreed that the Frank Buttram term mineral interest expired December 19, 1954 and reverted…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Curtis v. . AlbeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Smyth v. SmythSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Noble v. BodovitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Campbell v. NewmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Davis v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lane v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Mock v. StricklinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Smiley v. JaggersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Thompson v. Estate of H. H. CoffieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Pasotex Petroleum Company, a Corporation v. M.B. CameronCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.