Legal Opinion

Dixon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 9, 2010No. 4D09-234PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDamoorgian, J.

We reverse the trial court’s denial of John Dixon’s motions to suppress because the police entered Dixon’s apartment without consent and without sufficient exigent circumstances to justify a warrantless entry.

Dixon was charged with the following crimes: (1) trafficking in cocaine; (2) trafficking in oxycodone; (3) possession of al-prazolam; (4) possession of diazepam; (5) possession of carisoprodol; (6) possession of hydroeodone; (7) possession of cannabis; and (8) possession of drug paraphernalia. 1 He filed pre-trial motions to suppress all evidence observed and seized prior to and after…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. United States v. ShaibuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. Seibert v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  4. Riggs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  5. Phuagnong v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. P.R. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  2. McKelvin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  3. Puglisi v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  4. MICHAEL FRANK LAPACE v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  5. S.J. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API