Legal Opinion
Raylite Electric Corporation v. Noma Electric Corporation (Otis, Intervener)
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 2, 1950No. 141, Docket 21528Published
1Opinion of the Court
CHASE, Circuit Judge.
The appellee, Raylite Electric Corporation, brought this suit for a declaratory judgment after being notified by Noma Electric Corporation that it was infringing United States Patent No. 2,383,941, granted to Carl W. Otis September 4, 1945, on his application filed January 28, 1942, and two other patents which had been granted to Otis, under all of which Noma was the exclusive licensee. Before judgment Otis intervened as a defendant. The controversy as to the other two patents was adjusted by the parties and the trial proceeded under appropriate pleadings as a suit for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Traitel Marble Co. v. U. T. Hungerford Brass & Copper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- Gardner v. HerzSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- United States Galvanizing & Plating Equipment Corp. v. Hanson-Van Winkle-Munning Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
- Kwik Set, Inc. v. Welch Grape Juice Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.