Legal Opinion
Degrandchamp v. Michigan Mutual Insurance
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided August 27, 1980No. Docket 47711PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBashara, P.J.
Plaintiff’s motorcycle was damaged when it collided with an automobile. He commenced this action seeking property protection insurance benefits from defendant, the no-fault insurer of the automobile. Pursuant to GCR 1963, 117.2(3), the trial court granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.
Defendant appeals, alleging that the trial court erred in holding that a motorcycle is not excluded from property protection benefits under the no-fault insurance act, MCL 500.3101 et seq.; MSA 24.13101 et seq. Specifically, the defendant relies on MCL 500.3123(l)(a); MSA 24.13123(l)(a), which states,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Allstate Insurance v. KelleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- W. S. Butterfield Theatres, Inc. v. Department of RevenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Erlandson v. Genesee County Employees' Retirement CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Braden v. SpencerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. WashpunMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- Pioneer State Mutual Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, a Virginia Corporation v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co., a Foreign Corporation, St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co., a Foreign Corporation v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co., a Virginia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Pioneer State Mutual Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.