Bayless v. Dieckhaus
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Green, J.:
Ronald F. Bayless, Jr., appeals from a dismissal granted in favor of Brittany Dieckhaus. On appeal, Bayless argues that the statute of limitations was tolled under K.S.A. 60-517. We disagree with Bayless’ argument. The statute of limitations was not tolled under K.S.A. 60-517 because: (1) Bayless, exercising due diligence, should have been able to locate Dieckhaus and (2) Bay-less could have effected service of process on Dieckhaus within the statute of limitations period. Because this action was commenced outside tire statute of limitations period, the trial court properly…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Unrau v. Kidron Bethel Retirement Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2001
- Bracken v. Dixon Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- Cooper v. WerholtzSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
- Slayden v. SixtaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
- Bray v. BaylesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Underhill v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
- Lyons Ex Rel. Lawing v. HolderCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007