Legal Opinion · Dissent

ACW, INC. v. Weiss

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 30, 1997No. 96-894Published

1DissentTom Glaze, Justice

I must dissent. In my view, the majority decision is disturbing precedent and bodes trouble for Arkansas taxpayers. In short, I submit that Act 1052 of 1991 is unconstitutional because it was enacted contrary to Article 5, Section 38, of the Arkansas Constitution, as amended by Amendment 19.

First, it must be kept in mind that the Arkansas Constitution is a limitation upon and not a grant of power to the legislature. Erxleben v. Horton Printing Co., 283 Ark. 272, 675 S.W.2d 638 (1984). As previously mentioned, this court is called on to interpret Amendment 19, and in relevant simple terms,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Priest v. PolkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  2. Lybrand v. Wafford (1)Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  3. Burroughs v. IngramSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Erxleben v. Horton Printing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  5. Glover v. Hot Springs Kennel ClubSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API