Legal Opinion

In re David Fusfeld

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 1, 1914PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Habeas Corpus: Court of Appeals for Hamilton county.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court (Jones, E. H., and Jones, O. B., JJ., concurring; Swing, J., not sitting).

The three parties named in the caption above have severally applied to this court for a writ of habeas corpus, asking that the same issue against Charles C. Cooper, sheriff of Hamilton county, commanding him to discharge them from custody. They are each under sentence by the superior court *225for violation of an order of that court enjoining them from interfering in various and specific ways with the business of the Fulworth Garment Company, by which they had been employed.

A writ of habeas corpus cannot be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. PridgeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. In Re SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hayes v. HayesOhio Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. State Ex Rel. Frazer v. Administrator/Director Juvenile Court Detention HomeOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. In re RosenthalOhio Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. United States v. Romel WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API