Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Hayes

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 10, 1919PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error: Court of Appeals for Hamilton county.

1Opinion of the Court

Shohl, P. J,

This court granted an injunction against the defendant, Enos Hayes, “enjoining him *11from suffering and permitting his sheep, hogs and other live stock to enter and trespass upon the lands of the plaintiff, Missouri Hayes, while said sheep, hogs and other live stock are running at large, contrary to the provisions of the statute.”

Defendant violated the order of the court — was punished for it. He has been'guilty of disobedience of the orders of this court and the court of common pleas on five different occasions.

A rule was issued against him to show cause why he should not be…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. State ex inf. Crow v. ShepherdSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  4. Matter of Christensen Engineering Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Ex parte CreasySupreme Court of Missouri · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rose v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Beach v. BeachOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. National Distributing Company, Inc. v. United States Treasury Department, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  4. Beach, Jr. v. BeachOhio Court of Appeals · 1946
  5. Rossen v. RossenOhio Court of Appeals · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API