Legal Opinion

Hardware Mutual Casualty Company v. Baker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 13, 1968No. 41737PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD, Justice.

While defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as “plaintiff” was a retail dealer *1013in Pontiac automobiles at Healdton, one Ray Harrell, a salesman for him, started to see his barber, Lark Lamley, at Ratliff Corner, on June 1, 1963, driving a new 1963— Model Grand Prix Pontiac Coupe, belonging to plaintiff, to sell Lamley. Before reaching Ratliff Corner, the automobile was involved in a collision, almost demolishing it and injuring Harrell.

Plaintiff thereafter, in April, 1964, instituted the present action against plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as “defendant”,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McAnarney v. Newark Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. International Harvester Co. of America v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  3. Johnson v. Equitable Fire and Marine Insurance Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1963
  4. McLeod-nash Motors, Inc. v. Commercial Credit TrustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  5. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kimberly v. DeWittCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API