Nutmeg Housing Development Corp. v. Colchester
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtZarella, J.
In this appeal, we consider whether the trial court correctly determined that the plaintiff, Nutmeg Housing Development Corporation, failed to establish aggrievement in that it failed to prove that the defendant, the town of Colchester (town), had overvalued its property for tax purposes. After a bench trial, the court found that the plaintiff had failed to establish that it was aggrieved by the town's valuation because the court found that the plaintiff's expert did not present sufficient, credible evidence to establish that the town had overvalued the property. The trial court rendered…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United Technologies Corp. v. Town of East WindsorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Konover v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Lopiano v. LopianoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Torres v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Ireland v. Town of WethersfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Bridgeport v. Grace Bldg., LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Ridgaway v. Mount Vernon Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- Marchesi v. Bd. of Selectmen of the Town of LymeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- Kohl's Dept. Stores, Inc. v. Rocky HillConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
- Maricopa v. Hon. viola/el RanchoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.