Legal Opinion

Matanuska-Susitna Borough v. King's Lake Camp

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1968No. 857PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RABINO WITZ, Justice.

The principal issue presented in this appeal concerns the trial court’s determination that King’s Lake Camp was, by virtue of its charitable status, exempt from taxation by the Matanuska-Susitna Borough.

Article IX, section 4 of the Alaska constitution provides in part that:

All, or in any portion of, property, used exclusively for non-profit religious, charitable, cemetery, or educational purposes, as defined by law, shall be exempt from taxation.

In defining the limits of its taxing powers, the Alaska Legislature enacted AS 29.-10.336(a) which declared exempt from taxation

a…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Milk Wagon Drivers Union, Local 753 v. Meadowmoor Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Estate of HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Fredericka Home for the Aged v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Oregon Methodist Homes, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1961

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. City of Nome v. Catholic Bishop of Northern AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Winegardner v. Greater Anchorage Area BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Harmon v. North Pacific Union Conference Ass'n of Seventh Day AdventistsAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Greater Anchorage Area Borough v. Sisters of Charity of the House of ProvidenceAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  5. West Brandt Foundation, Inc. v. CarperSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API