Consumer Advocate Division, Office of the Attorney General v. Greer
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DROWOTA, Judge.
We granted this appeal to determine two issues: (1) whether the petition to intervene filed with the Tennessee Regulatory Authority (“TRA”), by the Consumer Advocate Division of the Attorney General’s Office (“Advocate”), constituted a written complaint; and (2) whether the TRA is statutorily required to hold a contested case hearing upon the filing of a written complaint.
After careful consideration, we first conclude that the petition to intervene filed by the Advocate in this case did not constitute a written complaint. Applying familiar rules of statutory…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. HarkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
- Cronin v. HoweTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. TurnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
- Tennessee Cable Television Ass'n v. Tennessee Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
- Nashville Mobilphone Co., Inc. v. AtkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
3Cited by22 opinions
- Realty Shop, Inc. v. RR Westminster Holding, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
- Houghton v. Aramark Educational Resources, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- Doe v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2003
- CAO Holdings, Inc. v. TrostTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- State Ex Rel. Pope v. United States Fire Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.