Legal Opinion

Consumer Advocate Division, Office of the Attorney General v. Greer

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1998PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DROWOTA, Judge.

We granted this appeal to determine two issues: (1) whether the petition to intervene filed with the Tennessee Regulatory Authority (“TRA”), by the Consumer Advocate Division of the Attorney General’s Office (“Advocate”), constituted a written complaint; and (2) whether the TRA is statutorily required to hold a contested case hearing upon the filing of a written complaint.

After careful consideration, we first conclude that the petition to intervene filed by the Advocate in this case did not constitute a written complaint. Applying familiar rules of statutory…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HarkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Cronin v. HoweTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. TurnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Tennessee Cable Television Ass'n v. Tennessee Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  5. Nashville Mobilphone Co., Inc. v. AtkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Realty Shop, Inc. v. RR Westminster Holding, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  2. Houghton v. Aramark Educational Resources, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Doe v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2003
  4. CAO Holdings, Inc. v. TrostTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State Ex Rel. Pope v. United States Fire Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2004

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API