Legal Opinion

Burke v. Harkins

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 5, 1929No. Appeal, 38PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

Martin Burke was the owner of valuable real estate in the City of Pittsburgh, subject to certain liens. Executions were issued and the properties sold in the fall of 1914 to one Callahan. Efforts were made to preserve the interests of Martin, and an arrangement was perfected through Thomas Burke, Jr., a nephew and employee, with one Kaufmann, by which the ownership of the sheriff’s vendee became vested in the latter, subject to an agreement by the terms of which the title was to be re-transferred upon the performance of certain conditions. As a result of the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Jackman v. Rosenbaum Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  2. Liggett's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. People v. . DorthyNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. In re the Estate of ThormanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  5. Bowman v. BerkeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Reid v. BrodskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Cohen v. JohnsonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Varsity Building & Loan Ass'n v. AnkeleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Stevens v. BurgessMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Gummed Tapes (PTY) Ltd. v. MillerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API